Day in day out – or at least several times each week I come across, what some would term ‘dissenting views’ on the reason for worldwide climate change.
According to the Australian Government, ‘the science is in’…. there is no dissent and thousands of credible scientists have defined the reason for climate change to be Human Caused Carbon Dioxide Pollution – end of story – now pay up!
I think the word they use is consensus. The problem of non consensus is simply ignored, or brushed under the carpet.
More than 1,000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore.
Of course the Government and its ‘tame media’ (think ABC and SBS) also neglect to tell us that less than – actually substantially less than 100% of ‘credible scientists’ agree that human kind is responsible for climate change, that climate change has been happening since the ‘creation’ of the universe and will continue to happen ad infinitum!
Obviously that will not suit the purposes of governments who want to raise taxes – nature cannot be taxed – only humans can be taxed. If nature could be taxed, there would be a tax on cyclones and hurricanes, wildfires and droughts, blizzards and ice storms, volcanoes and earthquakes and anything else that seemed outside of the normal weather patterns – as defined of course by the government!
We are reminded constantly that Australia must not lag behind other nations who have already put plans into place to combat climate change (such a stupid terminology really – climate is always changing). What we are not shown is that other countries/nations are backing away from the carbon taxation, ETS schemes, because they can see that it is not scientifically valid after all.
In the United States a sum of about US$12.5 million is allocated each year to the IPCC – you remember the IPCC – the panel who advises, worldwide on climate and climate change, and who has been shown to be corrupt (scientifically). The U.S. House of Representatives votes 244-179 to kill funding for the UN IPCC.
New Zealander Dr. Vincent Gray, an IPCC expert reviewer has recently come out and said he believes: “The IPCC is fundamentally corrupt. The only ‘reform’ (of the IPCC) I could envisage would be its abolition.”
He reminds us of one of the IPCC’s many scare tactics used to convince us that we humans are killing the planet. I think most of us would be familiar with the cry of the Pacific Islands – save us before rising sea levels flood our islands and kill our people!
In the August 2011edition of PACNEWS, we read the plea from the tiny South Pacific Nation of Tuvalu; about 1050km north of Fiji, that many Tuvalu residents were debating about whether they should leave the nation, to escape the rising seas. Yet Dr. Gray tells us:
“Around 1990 it became obvious that the local tide-gauge did not agree — there was no evidence of ‘sinking.’ So scientists at Flinders University, Adelaide, were asked to check whether this was true. They set up new, modern, tide-gauges in 12 Pacific islands, including Tuvalu, confident that they would show that all of them are sinking.
“Recently, the whole project was abandoned as there was no sign of a change in sea level at any of the 12 islands for the past 16 years. In 2006, Tuvalu even rose.”
Kind of brings to mind that other scenario of a polar bear on an ice flow, with the intention of scaring us into believing that we were killing off the polar bears because of human induced global warming / climate change. Al got it wrong again, when he told us: the Pacific island of Tuvalu is sinking. Al Gore told us that the inhabitants are invading New Zealand because of it.
I suppose if I were to mention that NASA (are they still credible?) has recently told us the Earth’s Magnetosphere has a giant hole in it – well would that interest our government’s paid lackeys? Nasty phrase really, but it does describe what some people think about those in the CSIRO and other government funded scientific bodies, who churn out all the dis-information the government wants you to hear.
If they were to stand tall and tell you that much of the weather here on earth is directed by the action of solar radiation and other cosmic radiation from outside of our solar system – they would have to stop threatening you with new taxation schemes to prevent it from happening? You cannot tax nature – nature has a patent on herself!
So instead of telling you the truth that climate change is a natural cyclical occurrence, they will terrorize you and your children and their children, with threats of human extinction due to human caused carbon dioxide pollution.
Terrorizing and bamboozling children is their latest game.
On Wednesday the 17th of August 2011 World Vision Youth Ambassador “Will” wrote on the 40 hour famine’s blog page:
Pretty much everyone agrees: climate change is happening. -95% of scientists, basically everyone whose pay-cheque isn’t coming from an oil company, agree that climate change is happening. Source:
Where do children and young people get their information from that anyone who disagrees with the theory of AGW must be in the pocket of Big Oil and be receiving money to say such things? Read more here.
If you look closely you will discover, that it is the paid scientists who work for and with the various governments of the world who are the ones who receive the funding, the money, the incentives etc. Once the government decided there is a particular road/track they wish to follow, and they offer funding to agencies to work with them on their ‘special projects’, you would be an idiot to come up with something which does not conform to the governments future plan. You would get no further funding; you would be out of a job – end of story!
The IPCC is not a scientific organisation – neither is it philanthropic! Your Governments are not either! They come up with plans, and then pay science to back them up. Speaking on the IPCC’s 4th Assessment Report, Senator James Inhofe said:
“This is a political document, not a scientific report, and it is a shining example of the corruption of science for political gain. The media has failed to report that the IPCC Summary for Policymakers was not approved by scientists but by UN political delegates and bureaucrats.”
To close just let me say, that I see this as a huge scam, put together by politicians and bureaucrats to gain more control of our lives and much more of our money.
So, in answer to the title of this blog:
Have the Tame Scientists told Bob and Julia?
I guess the answer is a resounding