>Climate debate derailed: scientists


In the Australian News tonight Scientists are claiming that the Climate Debate has been derailed! (red comments from Just ME)

The article found on the ABC website says:

Two-hundred-and-fifty scientists have signed an open letter saying they are deeply disturbed by the recent escalation in attacks on climate scientists, saying political action has been derailed. What are the credentials of these scientists? how many of them are actually working in the field of climate science? Who’s payroll are they on, and how much funding are they losing whilst we argue the premise of AGW?

Also there is the question of the ‘recent attacks on climate scientists’….. errr excuse me but by their very mis-behaviour in fixing and adulterating climate data and hockey stick graphs, they have left themselves open to attacks – read criticisms! Cherry picking of data is not the scientific method!

The letter, published in the journal Science, says the recent attacks on climate researchers are being run by special interests and the debate must address the compelling evidence of climate change. Hummmmmm…. special interest groups you say – now would that be the scientists who discovered the hockey stick was all a fabrication? Or would that be the wonderful anonyamous being who showed us the internal workings (emails) from CRU – remember Climategate anyone?

They say it is clear the planet is warming due to increased concentrations of greenhouse gases brought on by human activities. But heck! let’s forget all about the places on this planet that have undergone the coldest winters on record – since records were being kept!

Professor Kurt Lambeck, from the Australian National University, says the Federal Government cannot afford to allow any more delays. Hello – they are afraid of not getting more money for their pet projects!

“The negative aspects of the debate have been very unfortunate because I am sure that they’re one of the elements in this delay in starting the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme,” he said. If carbon is not polluting the atmosphere, then why do we need a carbon pollution reduction scheme which is to be paid for out of your and my pockets?

“Remember in three years time we’ll be in another election cycle so there won’t be any action. I don’t think that’s good for anybody.” Can’t we move this election forward please……..

Professor Lambeck, who is also a member of the US National Academy of Science, says further delays on action must not be an option.

“It’s a call really for rational debate to get the facts out, not to have that discussion deflected by extreme views that are not really based on the science,” he said.

Define ‘rational debate’…… ain’t that what the skeptics have been calling for since this debacle began – and which has been denied them ever since?

“The letter calls on policymakers and the public to urgently address the causes of climate change.” Well the public has spoke – I AM one of them public peoples…… and the politicians are just not listening. Minister Penny Wong still believes in fairies at the bottom of her garden!


31,000 US Scientists have signed a petition urging against the THEORY of man made climate change.

Nature Magazine, the academic journal that introduced the world to X-rays, DNA double helix, wave nature of particles, pulsars, and more recently the human genome, is set to publish a paper in June that shows atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is responsible for only 5-10% of observed warming on Earth.

As explained by the paper’s author Professor Jyrki Kauppinen, “The climate is warming, yes, but not because of greenhouse gases.”

For the pre-eminent scientific journal in the world to publish Kauppinen’s work shows conclusively that Al Gore’s much touted “scientific consensus” supporting human-caused global warming is a myth.

People it is time to stand up and be counted.

Things have been moderately quite these past few weeks, but there are still those, who firmly believe WE THE PEOPLE are warming the planet.

Keep writing to them, keep bombarding them with information. Don’t let them slip anything through Parliament – Congress or any other governmental body, to capture us in ‘forever taxation’ to deal with a problem that does not exist.

When THEY say ‘global warming’ or ‘climate change’ THEY mean man made and therefore caused by you and I……..

For years scientists have been trying to get out the message past the eco-censors that there are thousands and thousands of them who do not buy into the global warming hoax.

Since 2009 more than 238 physicists including Nobel Prize winner Ivar Giaever and professors from Harvard, MIT, Princeton, UCLA and dozens of other top universities and research institutions have signed an open letter addressed to the Council of the American Physical Society saying the scientific data did not support the conclusion that increased CO2 concentrations are responsible for global warming.

In 2009 over 700 international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC members, joined with Senator Inhofe in a Senate Minority Report to express their doubts over man-made global warming claims.

In the report U.S. Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg was quoted as saying “It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.”In the largest effort to date to document global warming dissent in the scientific community, 31,486 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,029 PhD, 7,157 MS, 2,586 MD and DVM, and 12,714 BS or equivalent – have signed on with the Global Warming Petition Project to state “the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity.” (reference)


About JustMEinT Musings

I like writing, reading and expressing my opinions. I prefer natural health and healing to pharmaceutical drugs. Jesus Christ is my Lord and Saviour.
This entry was posted in Anthropological Global Warming, GENERAL MUSINGS. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to >Climate debate derailed: scientists

  1. Anonymous says:

    >As a proud Canadian I take exception to the term Hockey Stick when referring to the historic temperature trend. This should be corrected to Hokey Stick, as developed by the Hokey Team of AGW scientists in their promotion of Hokey Science. Now, a real Hockey Stick should be used to whack the shit out of the climatards.

  2. >Accept appology please….. Aussie-isms abound in my writings 🙂 I do OF COURSE agree with your use of said 'stick'…….

  3. Anonymous says:

    >Me thinks that you really ought to check out the bona-fides of this "petition" allegedly signed by 31 thousand "scientists".

Comments are closed.