>Another day – Another Gate

This is the Bovine Gate

It is the bovine version of Climategate, complete with faulty science and noisy activists with big agendas.

Ladies and gentlemen I seem to have lost count of the number of ‘gates’ since last November when ‘Climategate‘ became a byword for fudged climate science.

Over the months various IPCC ‘Gospel’ quotes have been torn down brick by brick and dis-proven. I did feel sorry for the pigs and the cows, who were bearing the brunt of the (AGW) Climate Change ‘farting’ jokes. It was coming to the point that even people such as Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were advocating eating less meat.

Pachauri, who was re-elected the panel’s chairman for a second six-year term last week, said diet change was important because of the huge greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental problems – including habitat destruction – associated with rearing cattle and other animals. It was relatively easy to change eating habits compared to changing means of transport, he said.

The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation has estimated that meat production accounts for nearly a fifth of global greenhouse gas emissions. These are generated during the production of animal feeds, for example, while ruminants, particularly cows, emit methane, which is 23 times more effective as a global warming agent than carbon dioxide. The agency has also warned that meat consumption is set to double by the middle of the century.

But now another “gate’ has collapsed – fallen with the news that lower consumption of meat and dairy products will not have a major impact in combating global warming — despite persistent claims that link such diets to more greenhouse gases. So says a report presented Monday before the American Chemical Society.

Cows and pigs have gotten a “bum rap,” said Frank Mitloehner, an air quality expert at the University of California at Davis who authored the report. He is plenty critical of scientists and vegetarian activists such as Paul McCartney who insist that livestock account for about a fifth of all greenhouse-gas emissions.

He also is critical of highly-publicized campaigns that call for “meatless Mondays” or push the motto “Less Meat = Less Heat,” a European campaign launched in December during the Copenhagen climate summit. Talk of pricey air pollution permits of a “cow tax” for already cash-strapped farmers has surfaced in the U.S. and abroad.

Mr. Mitloehner said the claims that livestock are to blame for global warming are both “scientifically inaccurate” and a dangerous distraction from more important issues.
He has traced the problem back to a 2006 United Nations report, “Livestock’s Long Shadow,” that read: “The livestock sector is a major player, responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalents). This is a higher share than transport.”

Yes, livestock are major producers of methane, one of the greenhouse gases. But Mr. Mitloehner faults the methodology of the U.N. report, contending that the calculations were off.

In the report, the damning livestock “emissions” included those of the digestive variety — along with gases produced by growing animal feed and actual meat and milk processing. But the transportation analysis factored in only fossil fuel emissions from cars.

“This lopsided analysis is a classical apples-and-oranges analogy that truly confused the issue,” Mr. Mitloehner said.

Livestock burps have been vilified for a decade, however.

In 2000, Australian scientists reported that cows and sheep created 90 percent of methane emissions in that nation. German scientists went so far as to create fist-sized indigestion pills for their burping cows. Two years ago, Argentine scientists resorted to strapping plastic tanks to the backs of their cows to collect and measure their gaseous outputs.

“We certainly can reduce our greenhouse-gas production, but not by consuming less meat and milk. Producing less meat and milk will only mean more hunger in poor countries,” Mr. Mitloehner said.

The focus of confronting climate change, he said, should be on smarter farming, not less farming.

“The developed world should focus on increasing efficient meat production in developing countries where growing populations need more nutritious food. In developing countries, we should adopt more efficient, Western-style farming practices to make more food with less greenhouse gas production,” Mr. Mitloehner said.


Just ME in T says:

I am an OMNIVORE, I eat meat and veggies every day – and pass methane as well! So do my dogs! It is gratifying to know (phew) that our natural emissions are not responsible for Climate Change. I was so worried about that.

Till next time, keep reading, keep learning, keep discussing, and please keep praying for those poor politicians who believe every bit of bunkum that crosses their desks relative to the AGW scam. I bet there is more methane in the hallowed halls of Washington DC and Canberra than ever came out of the barnyards of our nations.


About JustMEinT Musings

I like writing, reading and expressing my opinions. I prefer natural health and healing to pharmaceutical drugs. Jesus Christ is my Lord and Saviour.
This entry was posted in Anthropological Global Warming, GENERAL MUSINGS. Bookmark the permalink.